TALLAHASSEE FRACKING BILL

from David Cullen

The following appears on the Florida Report listserv, an email alert system controlled by Sierra Club Florida to keep members aware of legislative doings.  To subscribe to that list and receive regular updates contact Sierra Club Florida Legislative Lobbyist Dave Cullen (cullenasea@aol.com)

Fracking bill up in committee on Tuesday, Nov 3, 2015

Calls Needed to stop a new fracking bill that will:

• wreak havoc with Florida’s water through excessive and wasteful consumptive use

• risk chemical pollution underground and/or at the surface

• continue to enable the use of fossil fuels in a world impacted by GHG driven climate change, and

• completely preempt local governments’ ability to protect their communities

HB 191 - Regulation of Oil and Gas  by Rep. Ray Rodrigues,  will be heard in the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee next Tuesday, November 3 at noon.  Please contact the members of the committee to urge them to vote NO on this bill.  Also, contact your personal Representative and Senator and urge them to stop the bills permitting fracking.   Committee member contact information is below. 

There are currently six fracking bills filed this year.  A brief explanation of each is included at the bottom of this alert.  Please take a minute to go through it so you’ll know which are good, which are bad, and which legislators are behind them.  (The sponsor of the bad bill HB 191 - the subject of this alert, is Rep. Rodrigues (with an ‘s’) who could easily be confused with Rep.Javier Rodriguez (with a ‘z’) the sponsor of a good Constitutional amendment to ban fracking, e.g.)

     House Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee 2016

Rep. Tom Goodson, Chair   850-717-5050      tom.goodson@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Jake Raburn, V Chair  850-717-5057      jake.raburn@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Jim Boyd                            850-717-5071      jim.boyd@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Neil Combee                   850-717-5039      neil.combee@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Brad Drake                      850-717-5005      brad.drake@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Bobby DuBose                850-717-5094      bobby.dubose@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Katie Edwards                850-717-5098      katie.edwards@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Larry Lee                           850-717-5084      larry.lee@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Ray Pilon                           850-717-5072      ray.pilon@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Jimmie Smith                  850-717-5034      jimmie.smith@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Cyndi Stevenson            850-717-5017      cyndi.stevenson@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Jennifer Sullivan            850-717-5031      jennifer.sullivan@myfloridahouse.gov

Rep. Clovis Watson                 850-717-5020      clovis.watson@myfloridahouse.gov

jim.boyd@myfloridahouse.gov, neil.combee@myfloridahouse.gov,brad.drake@myfloridahouse.gov, bobby.dubose@myfloridahouse.gov,katie.edwards@myfloridahouse.gov, tom.goodson@myfloridahouse.gov,larry.lee@myfloridahouse.gov, ray.pilon@myfloridahouse.gov, jake.raburn@myfloridahouse.gov,jimmie.smith@myfloridahouse.gov, cyndi.stevenson@myfloridahouse.gov,jennifer.sullivan@myfloridahouse.gov, clovis.watson@myfloridahouse.gov,

To find your  legislators paste this address into your browser:

http://myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/myrepresentative.aspx

Talking Points

Fracking imposes unnecessary and unacceptable risks on the residents of Florida.  The tremendous use of water that is forever lost due to contamination, the risk of contaminating our aquifers, and the continuing contribution of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere posed by fracking and burning natural gas is unconscionable when energy efficiency and renewable energy offer a clean and safe alternative. 

HB 191:

• Completely preempts anything to do with oil or gas to the state, including: exploration, development, production, processing, storage, or transportation.  The preemption would apply to existing ordinances as well as prohibiting the adoption of new ones.
• Uses a definition for “high-pressure well stimulation” that exempts the fracking activities most likely to be used in Florida from any regulation because those techniques, acid fracturing and acid matrix stimulation, are performed at lower pressure and are thereby excluded from the definition in the bill.  These are the techniques most often used in limestone and dolomite geological areas like Florida
• Exposes municipalities to all oil and gas exploration and production activities inside city limits, (not just fracking) regardless of local government’s wishes by eliminating a provision in current law that permits can only be issued if the governing body of the city passes a resolution in favor of the oil/gas activity,
• Provides that permits will be issued as soon as rulemaking is complete regardless of what a study required by the bill may reveal,
• Designates FracFocus as the official chemical disclosure registry while preventing citizens from knowing what is being injected into the ground beneath their feet by use of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.

Backers of the bill tout it as being a moratorium (a delay before fracking permits are issued.)  Permits won’t be issued right away, but they will be issued as soon as the rulemaking process is complete. And all of the other bad policy in the bill will be effective immediately. The preemption, the vulnerability of cities that oil/gas operators may want to drill in, and of course, the definition of “high-pressure well stimulation” that excludes the most likely methods of fracking for Florida from new regulation will all take effect on Day One.  No new regulations or permitting will be put in place for acid fracturing or acid matrix stimulation and the potential for contamination will occur regardless of whether or not “high-pressure well stimulations” permits are being issued.  The broad preemption language will prevent localities from doinganything about it, and the Trade Secrets provision will prevent residents from finding out what toxic chemicals they may be exposed to.

The bill calls for a study, but only of “high-pressure well stimulation.”  And there is no provision for delay or a change in direction if the study turns up a threat to public health - fracking permits get issued when rulemaking is complete.

Water Use:

• Fracking a multi-stage well can use more than a million gallons of fresh water.https://fracfocus.org/water-protection/hydraulic-fracturing-usage

• Some wells have used as much as 13 million gallons!http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/hf-report20121214.pdf  Section 2.1.1

• Flowback from fracking contains materials that must not be allowed to contaminate groundwater. https://fracfocus.org/hydraulic-fracturing-how-it-works/drilling-risks-safeguards

Contaminants:

• Oil and gas service companies used hydraulic fracturing products containing 29 chemicals that are (1) known or possible human carcinogens, (2) regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act for their risks to human health, or (3) listed as hazardous air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. These 29 chemicals were components of 652 different products used hydraulic fracturing. Chemicals Used in Hydraulic Fracturing U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Commerce and Energy, Minority Staff Report, 2011

• Flowback from fracking wells can contain radioactive materials from deep under the earth.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915249/

• The National Academy of Sciences discovered that homes within 1 kilometer (2/3 mile) were six times more likely to have six times more methane in their drinking water than those farther away.  Ethane levels were 23 times higher.

Trade Secrets:

• HB 191 lets well operators claim the chemicals they use are “trade secrets” which means residents, first responders, and medical personnel cannot find out what they are dealing with.  All that is necessary to claim “trade secret” protection is to say the secret is valuable to the well operator and that the well operator is trying to keep it a secret.  688.002 (4) Florida Statutes

Health Impacts:

The New York State Department of Health report states under ‘Health outcomes near HVHF (high volume hydraulic fracturing)Activity:

• One peer-reviewed study and one university report have presented data indicating statistical associations between some birth outcomes (low birth weight and some congenital defects) and residential proximity of the mother to well pads during pregnancy (Hill, 2012; McKenzie, 2014). Proximity to higher-density HVHF well pad development was associated with increased incidence of congenital heart defects and neural-tube defects in one of the studies (McKenzie, 2014).

Fracking legislation filed for 2016 session:

Good Anti-fracking bills:

There are two bills to ban fracking by statute:

SB 0166 Oil and Natural Gas Production or Recovery  by Sen. Soto has been referred to Environmental Preservation and Conservation; Commerce and Tourism; Community Affairs; Fiscal Policy

HB 0019 Well Stimulation Treatments by Rep. Jenne has been referred to Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee; Energy and Utilities Subcommittee; Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee; State Affairs Committee

There are also two good Joint Resolutions to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot to banfracking in the state:

SJR 0358 Hydraulic Fracturing  by Sen. Ring has been referred to Environmental Preservation and Conservation; Judiciary; Rules.

A similar Joint Resolution has been filed by Rep. Javier Rodriguez (with a ‘z’) -

HJR 0453 Well Stimulation by Rep. Rodriguez (with a ‘z’) but has not yet been referred to  committees.

The legislature can place proposed amendments to the state constitution without getting any petitions signed.  The only requirement is that the Resolution proposing the amendment get a 3/5ths vote in each chamber.  (It would also need the approval of 60% of the voters to be adopted.)

Bad Pro-fracking bills:

HB 0191 Regulation of Oil and Gas Resources by Rep. Rodrigues (with an ‘s’) has been referred to to Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee; Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee; State Affairs Committee.  (It is the bill up in Agriculture and Natural Resources on Tuesday, November 3.)

SB 0318 Regulation of Oil and Gas Resources by Sen. Richter has been referred to Environmental Preservation and Conservation; Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government; Appropriations.

This year the pro-fracking sponsors have not filed separate ‘trade secrets’ bills and are relying on the process already in statute in Chapter 688 to protect them from having to disclose what toxic chemicals they are injecting into the ground.

David Cullen

941-323-2404

cullenasea@aol.com

FRACKING BENEFITS NOT WORTH COST

'Fracking' benefits not worth costs

October 21, 2015

By Richard C. Silvestri , Fort Myers Beach Bulletin, Fort Myers Beach Observer

           

High pressure well stimulation is most commonly known as "Fracking."

This is a process used to extract hydrocarbons of oil and natural gas from shale layers that are approximately one mile down where the drill can turn horizontally and continue up to two miles. The process uses an average of four million gallons of water. A well can be fracked up to eight times, so on average each well can use 32 million gallons of water, equally one-foot of water over 100 acres.

The source of Fracking water can be natural springs like Silver Springs, ponds, lakes, creeks, rivers, streams or the aquifers that are under all of Florida. To that water is added numerous chemicals which are not revealed and the fossil fuel industry (FFI) refuses to reveal them.

Chemical analysis is easily obtained but the FFI denies any purported chemicals come from their operations and since no base-line analysis has been done, it is hard to prove. Not until recently did the need for this base-line become evident when illnesses and contaminated wells appeared. We know that benzene is one chemical for sure and in Florida, with its porous limestone, hydrofluoric acid is used to dissolve this. Benzene was banned from gasoline by the American Petroleum Institute (API) in the early 1950s due to their own research that concluded it was not safe for human contact. It was used to raise the octane rating of gasoline to eliminate motor "knock."

The Florida Petroleum Council contends, "Fracking is harmless." Yet Fracking and, what other names it goes by, uses benzene within the aquifers. Hydrofluoric Acid is used to etch glass and is so corrosive to glass it is kept in plastic containers. Glass is silicone dioxide, the major component of sand, and is in the soil in various silicon compounds and limestone has many silicon compounds in it.

Once a well is fracked, water, called "flow back," returns through the bore hole. However some 80 percent of the water remains along with the chemicals. The other 20 percent is placed in holding ponds or is deep-well injected at local sewage plants. Therefore, virtually all of this chemical 

additive of millions of gallons is left in the ground.

In addition to the chemicals, a gritty material called "propant" is injected. Propants hold the fissures in the shale open so the hydrocarbons can flow into the bore which is lined with small holes.

These holes are also the method which the pressure from explosives in the well pipe inject more pressure to fracture and crack the shale, hence the verb "to Frack" and its lineage of names such as "Fracking," "Fracked," etc. Addition of these propants creates local air pollution when they are put into the mix at the surface, and they linked to silicosis.

Having traveled through Texas and North Dakota and personally seen the oil wells there and from reports about earthquakes from fracking in Oklahoma, my personal impression is that today most if not all oil and natural gas is extracted by the Fracking process. That goes right along with the scientific consensus that in the USA the "low hanging fruit" or "peak oil" has been exhausted and Fracking is getting at the last drops.

While the FFI reports that the USA has a "mother lode" of natural gas, the global demand will mean we in the USA will have to compete with that demand which will drive up prices domestically. Unfortunately and most importantly, Fracking can devastate Florida's beauty, its agriculture

and its people.

Are the benefits worth the costs?

Richard C. Silvestri is the vice president of Treasure Coast Progressive Alliance. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from the University of Miami, is a former hazardous materials instructor and a retired chief fire officer.

- See more at: http://www.fortmyersbeachtalk.com/page/content.detail/id/528294/-Fracking--benefits-not-worth-costs.html?nav=5049#sthash.bz8MhR61.oSCoYUi6.dpuf